BMP CHALLENGE Update
April 20, 2007

In this issue...
  • Participating in the BMP CHALLENGE is EASY!
  • Guaranteeing Net Returns Eases BMP Adoption
  • Piloting "Enhanced Nutrient Management" with Pennsylvania Corn Farmers
  • Calculating Net Returns with the BMP CHALLENGE

  • Guaranteeing Net Returns Eases BMP Adoption

    With their income on the line, farmers can be reluctant to try new practices. Income guarantees can ease the transition.

    In 2006, the BMP CHALLENGE program provided a safety net for 43 farmers in five states, covering performance of nutrient management and reduced tillage practices. The program uses side-by-side comparison strips in farmer fields to evaluate both yield and net returns. Fertilizer or tillage cost savings are factored in to determine the net economic return to the farmer.

    Participating farmers work with a local crop advisor, Extension or other expert to develop their nutrient or tillage recommendation, following local university protocols for their state. They select a field up to 160 acres in size to test the new approach. A carefully located check strip receives the farmer's conventional practice. At harvest, the farmer and advisor assess and report yields and fertilizer or tillage costs. If net returns decline versus check strip performance, the farmer receives a cash payment to make up the difference.

    BMP performance

    Although nutrient management yielded an average of seven bushels less than higher fertilizer application rates, net return was a positive $0.76 per acre (table below). This means the extra bushels did not pay for the extra fertilizer applied to the check strip. These results are consistent with prior years' results on over 5,041 acres, which show a positive net return with university nutrient application rates.

     

    Nutrient BMP

    Reduced Tillage

    Participating fields in 2006

    33

    13

    Total acres

    1,456

    614

    BMP yield (bu/acre)

    Average and range

    174

    158 - 195

    138

    72 - 179

    Check-strip yield (bu/acre)

    Average and range

    181

    165 - 201

    157

    110 - 199

    Net return (minus fertilizer and tillage cost reductions)

    Average and range

    $ 0.76

    ($53.03) - $81.25

    ($32.86)

    ($156.77) - $26.93

    Total nitrogen reduced (lbs.)

    54,841

    --

     

    In 2006, the first year BMP CHALLENGE program was offered for reduced tillage, tillage cost savings did not overcome an average yield reduction of 19 bushels per acre. In particular, farmers and advisors reported challenges with weed management. Reduced tillage may have risks with adoption, but if mistakes are made or conditions are right the income guarantee can be an important tool. First-time reduced tillers have their income protected while learning how to make conservation tillage profitable in their fields. The 2006 participants are all looking forward to continuing the program in 2007.

    For additional information, including applications for the 2007 season, visit BMP CHALLENGE online or call (608) 663-4697.


    Piloting "Enhanced Nutrient Management" with Pennsylvania Corn Farmers

    What happens to corn yields when you reduce nitrogen rates below university recommendations?

    Is this a strategy that could be used in watersheds severely impacted by excess nutrients?

    Over time, will factors such as drought, that can limit yields regardless of nutrient application rates, work to reduce the economic impact of lower fertilizer rates?

    In 2005 through 2006, 18 corn producers in Pennsylvania piloted this enhanced nutrient management approach to help provide answers. Working with Team Ag, a crop consulting firm based in Lancaster County, producers applied nitrogen at rates up to 15 percent below university recommendations on an average of 94 acres per farm. Overall, nitrogen reductions totaled 45,720 pounds across 1,688 participating acres.

    Yields decreased by 15.6 bushels per acre for corn grown for grain and 2.3 tons per acre for corn grown for silage. After factoring in an average of $9.26 per acre in nitrogen fertilizer cost savings, farmer net returns decreased by $25.32 per acre for corn for grain and $36.58 per acre for silage. Net returns guarantee payments from the BMP CHALLENGE compensated farmers for these losses.

    The region received nearly 10 inches of rain in June of 2006, which may have impacted the results. "We'll be repeating this experiment in 2007 and hopefully beyond," reports Brian Brandt, director of risk management programs for American Farmland Trust which coordinated the project. "We'd like to see how the rates perform over time under a variety of conditions, and what the average net returns will be, to evaluate this approach to keeping farming profitable and improving water quality."

    Funding for crop consulting services, farmer incentives and the net returns guarantee were provided by the Pennsylvania Delegation of the Chesapeake Bay Commission and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.


    Calculating Net Returns with the BMP CHALLENGE

    Both yield and nutrient or tillage costs are factored into the equation when calculating net economic returns for farmers participating in the BMP CHALLENGE.

    Yield Assessment

    Yields are determined at harvest by using a weigh wagon, portable scale or yield monitor for the conventionally managed check strip and the immediately adjacent BMP-managed strips. Performing the yield assessment on adjacent strips helps minimize potential impacts of within-field variability on results.

    Yields are converted to dollars by using base corn prices set by the USDA Risk Management Agency. The 2007 price for corn grown for grain is $3.50 per bushel. Silage prices are set regionally, at $25.00 per ton for Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin and $30.50 per ton in Pennsylvania and much of the east coast.

    Cost Savings

    Nutrient costs are based on actual farmer costs. Tillage operation costs are estimated, using figures from the Purdue MAX software program which is updated annually or other state- or region-specific reference costs from a recognized authority such as a land-grant university in the state.

    An example of a net returns calculation for the Nutrient BMP CHALLENGE is provided below, using the base price of $3.50 per bushel for corn for grain.

     

    CHECK STRIP

    NUTRIENT BMP RATE

    Amount of

    N Applied

    180 lbs/acre x $0.35/lb = $63.00/acre

    150 lbs/acre x $0.35/lb = $52.50/acre

    Amount of

    P Applied

    75 lbs/acre x $0.30 = $22.50/acre

    35 lbs/acre x $0.30 = $10.50/acre

    Amount of K

    Applied

    0 lbs/acre x $0 = $0/acre

    0 lbs/acre x $0 = $0/acre

    Total Fertilizer

    Cost

    $85.50/acre

    $63.00/acre

    $85.50 - $63.00 = $22.50/acre fertilizer cost savings!

    Situation: Yield Loss with BMP

    180 bu/acre x $3.50/bu = $630.00/acre

    176 bu/acre x $3.50/bu = $616.00/acre

    Net Yield Loss

    $630.00 - $616.00 = $14.00/acre yield loss

    Net Economic Return

    $22.50 savings - $14.00 loss = $8.50/acre net savings!

    $850.00 savings on a 100 acre farm!

     

    In this example, the farmer saved $22.50 per acre in fertilizer costs and achieved comparable but slightly lower yields. The extra fertilizer applied to the check strip was not worth the extra cost to the farmer.


    Participating in the BMP CHALLENGE is EASY!

    The BMP CHALLENGE is designed to help corn farmers try out nutrient and tillage BMPs - on their own farms, in their own fields - without risk to their income. It is a great tool for crop advisors, watershed groups, public agency professionals and others working with farmers to meet conservation and income goals.

    In a 2005 survey of 700 corn producers throughout the corn belt, 98% were concerned with the increasing costs of fertilizer yet 23% were not crediting nutrients in manure applied to their fields and 17% were not crediting nitrogen contributions from prior season soybean crops.

    When asked about nutrient testing, 88% said they were not using the pre-sidedress nitrogen test or other techniques to adjust nutrient applications in-season. Another 60% were not banding fertilizer applications in the planting row, and 66% had not tried variable rate applications of phosphorus fertilizer.

    Three-quarters of our surveyed farmers indicated they would be interested in a guarantee program to help them implement BMPs without economic risk! BMP CHALLENGE provides an opportunity for these farmers to try out nutrient and tillage BMPS, without betting the farm. The first step is to contact us at (608) 663-4697 or visit www.bmpchallenge.org for answers to your questions.

    A simple pre-planting application form is all that is needed to enroll a field. After enrollment, we'll request additional information about the BMP rates applied, check strip location and final yields and inputs. Let us help you through the process to maximize returns to your farmers - without risk!

    Visit our partners!

    American Farmland Trust, Agricultural Conservation Innovation Center

    Agflex

    IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

    USDA NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant Program



    Join our mailing list!
    phone: 608 663-4697

    Forward email

    This email was sent to andrew.arlt@bmpchallenge.org, by ipmworks@ipminstitute.org

    BMP CHALLENGE | 1914 Rowley Avenue | Madison | WI | 53726